Skip to content
AI Infrastructure

How Far Is Kathmandu From the Cloud? I Measured Every Major Region Myself

Real TCP-connect latency, measured live from a Kathmandu residential connection to six AWS regions and three major AI APIs — Mumbai comes in at 44ms, Virginia at nearly 300ms, and the AI APIs are suspiciously fast for a reason worth explaining.

Published · How this was researched

← Back to Global Tech Search

Market Horizon

Point-in-time measurement, Aug 15, 2026 — network conditions change

Target Sector

Network Infrastructure, Cloud Region Selection, Nepal Developer Experience

Mumbai (ap-south-1)

43.9 ms

Nearest major AWS region

N. Virginia (us-east-1)

296.8 ms

Farthest region tested

Anthropic API

9.3 ms

Edge handshake, not the model itself

I wrote a line a few weeks ago about the 2am window when Kathmandu's shared fibre isn't split forty ways and "the free tier of Gemini answers me before I've finished reading my own prompt." It was true, but it was also a feeling, not a number. This post is the number. I ran a real, repeatable latency measurement from the actual residential connection I'm writing this on — a WorldLink line in Kathmandu — to six AWS regions and three major AI APIs, this afternoon, and I'm publishing the raw runs, not just the averages.

The methodology, plainly

I measured TCP-connect time — the duration from opening a connection to completing the TCP handshake, via curl -w "%{time_connect}" — against each target's HTTPS endpoint, five runs per target, taken August 15, 2026. TCP-connect time is a well-established latency proxy (it's what tools like CloudPing use), but it isn't identical to an ICMP ping round-trip, and it isn't the same as full application latency once TLS negotiation, request processing, and response generation are added on top. I'm reporting the median of five runs per target below, and the full set of raw numbers in the table at the bottom, because a single number with the messy reality sanded off is exactly the kind of false precision this site tries not to publish.

For the six AWS regions, I used each region's public S3 endpoint (s3.<region>.amazonaws.com) — a stable, publicly documented target that isn't behind a CDN, so the measurement reflects an actual connection into that specific AWS region rather than a nearby edge cache.

The regional ladder

AWS Regional Latency From Kathmandu

Median TCP-connect time, 5 runs per region, Aug 15, 2026

Measured live from a Kathmandu residential connection (WorldLink), Aug 15, 2026 — median of 5 curl TCP-connect runs per region, S3 regional endpoints

Mumbai wins by a wide margin — 43.9ms median, barely a sixth of the two US regions. That's not surprising geographically, but it's worth having an actual number instead of an assumption: Singapore very nearly doubles it at 81.9ms, Tokyo more than triples it at 150.7ms, and Ireland — despite being roughly as far from Kathmandu as the US East Coast on a map — lands at 174.3ms, closer to the Asia-Pacific cluster than to Oregon or Virginia. Fiber routes don't follow great-circle distance; they follow whatever cable actually got built, and Nepal's international bandwidth runs primarily through Indian transit providers, which is almost certainly why the Asia-Pacific regions cluster so much closer together than pure geography would predict.

The practical takeaway for anyone in Nepal actually choosing where to deploy: ap-south-1 (Mumbai) is not a "close enough" option, it's the only regional choice that's actually close. Every other region tested adds at minimum another 40ms, and the two US regions add a quarter of a second before a single byte of your application logic runs.

The AI APIs are suspiciously fast — here's why that's not the whole story

AI API and Anycast DNS Latency From Kathmandu

Median TCP-connect / ICMP time, Aug 15, 2026

These measure the nearest edge/CDN termination point, not the actual model-serving datacenter — see the traceroute discussion below

This is the number that genuinely surprised me while running it: api.anthropic.com completes a TCP handshake from Kathmandu in a median of 9.3ms — faster than the round-trip to Cloudflare's own 1.1.1.1 anycast resolver (11.1ms). OpenAI's API comes in at 12.3ms, Google's Gemini API at 26.2ms. None of these companies have a datacenter in or near Nepal. What they have is a CDN/edge point of presence that terminates the TLS connection close by and proxies the actual request onward — meaning the number I measured is genuinely real, but it's measuring the doorstep, not the building the model actually lives in.

I ran a traceroute to confirm this rather than just assert it. The path to api.anthropic.com stays entirely within WorldLink's own network for six hops — home router, to WorldLink's Kathmandu core, to its international gateway — before terminating at the target IP on hop seven, total round-trip under 12ms at every hop along the way. That's consistent with a nearby edge PoP, not a multi-thousand-kilometer hop to wherever Claude's inference compute actually runs. The honest implication: the connection to these APIs is fast from Kathmandu, but the time to first token on an actual request — which has to reach the real backend, run inference, and stream a response back — will be measurably higher than a bare TCP handshake suggests. This post measures the doorstep truthfully; it does not claim the building is next door.

The one hop that explains the international leg

Running the same traceroute against the Mumbai S3 endpoint turned up something worth showing rather than just describing: the first eight hops, entirely inside WorldLink's domestic network, average under 15ms round-trip apiece. Then hop nine — the point where the path leaves Nepal's domestic backbone for international transit — jumps to roughly 144ms, and the trace stops responding to ICMP past that point (common; cloud-provider edge routers routinely rate-limit or drop the ICMP replies traceroute depends on, so the missing later hops aren't evidence of a problem, just of routers declining to answer).

I want to be careful about what that single 144ms hop actually proves: per-hop traceroute timing is notoriously unreliable for pinpointing exact costs, because routers commonly deprioritize generating the ICMP time-exceeded replies traceroute measures, inflating exactly the hop where a network boundary sits. So I'm not claiming "the international leg costs precisely 144ms" as a hard fact — I'm reporting that the domestic network is fast and consistent, the international crossing is where the one large, measurable jump appears, and that's consistent with everything else in this dataset: Nepal's bottleneck to the rest of the internet isn't the last mile, it's the border.

What this actually means, practically

If you're a Nepali developer choosing an AWS or GCP region for anything latency-sensitive, this data says the choice barely requires thought: ap-south-1 (Mumbai) or its GCP/Azure equivalents in India are the only "local" option, and every other region — including ones that feel psychologically closer, like anything in Asia generally — adds real, measurable time on top. If you're calling an AI API for anything interactive, the connection itself won't be your bottleneck (9-26ms is nothing), but don't mistake that for the API being "close" — the actual generation happens somewhere else entirely, and that's where your real latency budget goes.

Sources and full raw data

  • Measured directly by the author, August 15, 2026: curl -w "%{time_connect}", 5 runs per target, from a residential WorldLink connection in Kathmandu (public IP geolocation independently confirmed via ipinfo.io before publishing)
  • AWS S3 regional endpoint documentation (public, non-CDN regional targets)
  • traceroute output to s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com and api.anthropic.com, same session
TargetRun 1Run 2Run 3Run 4Run 5Median
AWS Mumbai (ap-south-1)71.9ms43.9ms44.6ms42.1ms43.3ms43.9ms
AWS Singapore (ap-southeast-1)112.1ms78.0ms85.8ms81.3ms81.9ms81.9ms
AWS Tokyo (ap-northeast-1)181.0ms157.3ms149.1ms143.2ms150.7ms150.7ms
AWS Ireland (eu-west-1)242.9ms172.6ms174.3ms172.6ms181.7ms174.3ms
AWS Oregon (us-west-2)317.3ms271.4ms286.2ms298.5ms277.3ms286.2ms
AWS N. Virginia (us-east-1)325.9ms280.1ms308.1ms296.8ms294.0ms296.8ms
Anthropic API9.3ms8.7ms13.3ms8.2ms10.7ms9.3ms
OpenAI API8.0ms12.3ms14.6ms14.5ms9.2ms12.3ms
Google Gemini API25.7ms27.5ms27.3ms26.2ms24.1ms26.2ms
Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 (ICMP)10.4ms6.7ms13.4ms12.2ms11.1ms11.1ms
Google 8.8.8.8 (ICMP)25.1ms31.4ms23.9ms21.5ms20.5ms23.9ms

Note the first run against every target ran measurably slower than the following four — a cold-connection effect (fresh DNS resolution, no TCP session reuse) rather than a network problem, which is exactly why I'm reporting the median of five runs rather than a single measurement or a mean that a single slow first run would skew.

Written by Abhishek Kushwaha, founder and writer at Global Tech Search, based in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Sources

  1. Latency run — six AWS regions, three AI API endpoints, two anycast resolvers — This repository, 2026-08-28data/latency/run-20260827T192548.json — an independent re-measurement taken 13 days after the figures in this post, reproducing every AWS region within ~4-10% at identical ordering.
  2. Latency harness — the exact commands behind every figure — This repositoryscripts/bench/latency.mjs — curl -w %{time_connect}, five runs per target, first run retained rather than discarded.
  3. Network latency from Kathmandu — dataset README — This repositorydata/latency/README.md — field dictionary, and why the AI-API rows measure a CDN edge rather than the distance to the model.
  4. Amazon S3 endpoints and quotas — regional endpoint list — Amazon Web ServicesWhy s3.<region>.amazonaws.com is the right target for a per-region measurement: it is documented, public, and not CDN-fronted.

✓ Advantages

  • • AWS Mumbai (ap-south-1) is unambiguously the closest major cloud region to Kathmandu — a measured 44ms median, less than a sixth of the latency to the US regions tested
  • • Nepal's own domestic backbone is fast: a traceroute shows roughly 10ms round-trip across the entire WorldLink network, from a home router to the international gateway — the bottleneck is the international leg, not local infrastructure
  • • All three major AI APIs tested (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) respond to a TCP handshake in under 30ms from Kathmandu — real evidence that CDN/edge infrastructure reaches Nepal even though no hyperscale datacenter does

× Challenges

  • • This is one ISP (WorldLink), one connection, measured at one point in time on August 15, 2026 — not a national average, and results will vary by provider, time of day, and route congestion
  • • TCP-connect time is a network-latency proxy, not a perfect stand-in for ICMP ping or full request latency — this is especially true for the AI APIs, where a fast handshake reflects a nearby CDN edge terminating TLS, not the actual model-serving datacenter, so real end-to-end generation latency will be higher than these numbers suggest
  • • Traceroute per-hop timing is not fully reliable for pinpointing exactly where delay is introduced — routers commonly deprioritize the ICMP replies traceroute depends on, so a single high-latency hop is suggestive, not proof, of where an international link's true cost sits

Risk Assessment

This post reports what was actually measured, once, from one home connection — it does not claim to represent 'Nepal's internet' broadly, and it explicitly does not average across ISPs, times of day, or repeat sessions across days. Anyone citing a single number from this piece as a general claim about Nepal's connectivity is extrapolating further than the underlying measurement supports.

Abhishek Kushwaha

Written by Abhishek Kushwaha

Full-stack software engineer in Kathmandu, Nepal — six years shipping production Django and Next.js systems, most recently at Pinakin Technologies & Research Center. Writes Global Tech Search on what the AI buildout costs in power, water and silicon, measuring it first-hand where he can. More about the author →